Jeff asked...
1. Is it fiscally responsible to raise taxes by $750 million to build a $200 million jail?
2. Since you have chosen to disrespect the choices that voters made in 2006, why should the voters show you any respect in 2007?
3. Did Bob Bedinghaus write this blog for you or do the two of you just happen to believe that huge tax increases are the answer to everything?
Jeff,
Thank you for visiting my website. In my blog I stated that this would be a hotly debated topic. I encouraged people to civilly engage in constructive dialogue. In a representative democracy we elect officials to make decisions based on what they believe is right. Commissioners Portune and Pepper carried out their respective duties in a legal, lawful manner. Every poll taken in recent years has placed safety and security as one of, if not the major issue, that faces Cincinnati. Like all parents, my wife Sue and my top concern is the well being and safety of our children, Jane and Anna. The children and citizens of Cincinnati deserve to have peace of mind and clean safe streets. We have mourned over 500 deaths in this city in recent years. We cannot put a price tag on the lives that have been lost. We must do our best to prevent such tragedies from happening in the future. The new jail is a step in this direction.
Your first question leaves the impression we are "only building a jail." Yes, it will cost $200 million to build a jail, but we have to pay for the cost of operating the jail as well. A detail left out of the last jail tax debate. This is a comprehensive plan to create more jail space, provide funds for the operation of the jail, reduce crime, lower recidivism by providing rehabilitation, re-entry, and educational opportunities. Money will also be used to fund additional safety programs. Follow this URL to the county website for additional information.
As a short term solution I support the tax. As a long term solution it is clear that we must reduce the root causes of crime. Thus we need economic development, educational opportunities, and housing development that create a quality of life that is appealing to keep citizens in the county.
The cost of crime has been far too great for far too long. The middle class is leaving Hamilton County for the safety of other counties.
There are a number of politicians that ALL agree that Hamilton county needs a new jail. (Deters, Leis, DeWine, Portune, Pepper) This is a fact. Perhaps what you may want to ask is where do all the city council candidates stand on this issue. Then you can get a broader perspective of how this issue influences our area. The voters have a right to put this on the ballot if they can raise the necessary signature
Your second question incorrectly implies that I disrespect the voters. Every time I speak to voters I urge them to get out and get involved in the political process. I believe that the public needs to be well informed to vote on the issues. A difference of opinion between people of good will is not disrespect. It is a difference of opinion. I am running my second campaign for city council. I have the utmost respect for the voters I've met at festivals, meetings, life rallies, neighborhood councils, citizens on patrol evenings, and events like Taste of Cincinnati. I respect bloggers who civilly interact to further knowledge on issues. I invite you to join me at upcoming events where we can speak face-to- face.
People can respect that I see four intertwined issues as central to building a Greater Cincinnati: Economic Development, Educational Excellence, Safety and Security, and Housing Development. Young families have three non-negotiables when it comes to living in the city: Great schools, clean safe streets, and market-rate, affordable housing.
We need to think in terms of "AND " not "OR". We must build an economic base so we can also offer world class services and address the societal needs of our poorest citizens. We must clearly address the educational issues that impact the economic, social, and political lives of every day citizens. People vote for candidates who can make decisions, who can stand by their convictions, who can do the right thing. Very rarely does a voter agree with elected officials on EVERY issue. Honesty, trust, political affiliation, likes/dislikes, and many other factors play a role in receiving votes in an open field race. I have personally invested much time in trying to make my neighborhood and Cincinnati better. I want the voters to do the same as their elected officials.
I certainly DO NOT believe" that huge taxes are the answer to ever thing." If you look at my platform and previous statements I believe that fiscal responsibility is an issue that council must address. Where there is waste it must be cut. I don't see any waste in providing security for our children and clean safe streets for our citizens. I do favor reducing taxes where they can be reduced or eliminated. I will bring that frame of mind to council.
David Pepper and Peter Bronson wrote excellent articles describing how this issue has brought many differing groups of people together on both sides of the issue. They pointed out some other tools we can use in the fight against crime. As I stated in the blog,' Those opposing the plan must create a new one that has vision, intentionality, and accountability. It must cover the same scope and sequence. It must specifically say how it will be funded. I am open to proposals that can help us build a greater Cincinnati. I look forward to seeing how we will step onto the higher field the commissioners have given us.
Labels: Safety and Security